The regional planning meeting gave a well attended public hearing on their preliminary land use plan for District, Longswamp and Rockland townships along with the Boro Of Topton that comprise the Brandywine School District. The plan in its current form turns Rockland and District Townships into Yellowstone Park. All the industry and housing development along with Agriculture will be in Longswamp and Topton. By combing their resources each individual township does not have to set aside land for industry, housing, agriculture... This is a good ideal to promote the entire school district. The plan was generally well received but with complaints about specific issues. The main complaints were from Rockland and District not having any land set aside for agriculture.
The presentation was given by the consultant that advised on the plan. It was just his style but he often came across as a former member of the Soviet Agricultural Planning Commission. Just because millions of Russians starved while sitting on some of the most fertile crop land in the world is no reason central planning couldn't work in Berks County. There was no mention at all that people actually owned the land he was showing on his colored maps.
Is there any reason that property owners couldn't have selected how they wanted their land zoned within reason? Property owners could have just gone down to their township office and colored in their property. Some land is mandated as protected water sheds and swamps (can't have too many mosquitoes and it is Longswamp not Longwetland) for the public good but surely in an area where people have ties to the land for over 200 years know more about what there property is good for and what the want for their children then an expert from out of town. I don't think old Thomas Jefferson would have been a happy camper last night. He had this quaint notion that private property rights were the basis of a free county. He also thought that some people were property but having conflicting ideals makes us human.
The growth projections were based on the years that Rockland and Longswamp were growing. Now if development in Rockland is severely curtailed and Longswamp is designated mostly farm land that has to effect the future growth in the area. A family who moves into the area buying an old farmhouse on several acres of land in Rockland is probably not going to buy a home in a high density area. They will just look elsewhere. That is the trouble with planners they become so enamored with their graphs they forget that people have choices. At least for the time being.
Overall it is a good start on planning for the future of this area. The planing commission members deserve our support and out input in future meetings to make this a success. The complete plan can be seen at any of the township offices or can be downloaded be forewarned it is a big plan.
REPORT

Agricultural Zone Summary:
1. A deliberately worded purpose statement that cites the valid public purpose to
protect and preserve prime agricultural soils and valuable farming operations in
compliance with Section 604.(3) of the Municipalities Planning Code;
2. A “hands-off” and “by-right” regulatory approach to farms conducting normal
farming operations;
3. Severely restricted development potential (say 1 lot for every 20 acres of lot area);
4. A minimum and maximum lot area of 1 and 2 acres, respectively, for nonfarm
uses;
5. Liberal accessory use regulations that specifically include farm occupations,
roadside stands and other rural pursuits, provided that these uses have little
impact and that adequate provision is made for the safe disposal of wastes;
6. Separate provisions of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) that
ensure proper siting, operation and disposal of wastes;
7. Siting standards for future dwelling units proposed that protect sunlight
easements/equipment turning radii onto adjoining farms and locate homes so as
to minimize land use conflict;
8. Language that specifically authorizes existing homes as permitted uses; and,
9. An Agricultural Nuisance Disclaimer that informs prospective residents of
potential impacts associated with normal farming practices that are protected
under the PA Right to Farm Law.
10. Although effective agricultural zoning ordinance can preserve farmlands in the short run,certain legal principles on accommodating growth can threaten their long-term integrity.Therefore the Region should continue to support the County’s Agricultural ConservationEasement Program and the respective Township’s Agricultural Security Area programs.Certainly easement funds are limited and all prime lands cannot be purchased immediately.Therefore, local officials should commit to the preservation of farmlands through zoning until easements can be purchased through this program.
11 , It is critical that deliberate actions be taken by local officials to prevent surface water degradation in these areas. Local officials should employ a variety of techniques that encourage farmers to install riparian buffers along the creek and its tributaries. Therefore, local officials should adopt
and implement a riparian buffer ordinance in this Zone and others. Then compliance should be required whenever a zoning permit is needed. The Region should also lobby the County Agricultural Preserve Board to revise its conservation easement eligibility prerequisites to include installed riparian buffers, particularly in high-quality or exceptional value watersheds. Required NRCS Conservation Plans should also be fitted to include riparian buffers. Tax assessment officials should be required to reduce assessed values of lands within riparian buffers. Farmers should also be educated about the Federal CREP program and income tax deductions that are made available to property owners who place conservation easements upon their properties for riparian buffers. Local watershed groups should target important farms that can offer the best improvement to surface water quality. These sitesshould become local priorities for fund-raising and actual riparian buffer construction.. In addition all farms
should at all times conduct their operations in compliance with approved
Conservation and Nutrient Management Plans, as applicable. Local officials and staff
should quickly notify the Berks County Conservation District when suspected
problems or violations arise.
Conservation Zone Summary Recomendations:
1. A deliberately worded purpose statement that cites the valid public purpose to
protect and preserve important natural features in compliance with Section 604.(1)
of the Municipalities Planning Code;
2. A “hands-off” and “by-right” regulatory approach to farms conducting normal
farming operations;
3. Severely restricted development potential (say 1 lot for every 5-10 acres of lot
area);
4. Flexible lot design standards that enable new homes to tuck into the “nooks and
crannies” of the rugged terrain;
5. Provision for flag lots and shared driveways to facilitate efficient lotting and
access;
6. Required environmental impact report that details important natural conditions on a site and presents a strategy for their protection;
7. Regulations governing the conduct of forestry operations in all areas of the
Region;
8. Regulations governing the use of riparian buffers throughout the Region;
9. Requirements for 2 on-lot sewers and a domestic well prior to establishment of
new homes;
10. Liberal accessory use business regulations that specifically include home, rural
and farm occupations, provided that these uses have little impact and that
adequate provision is made for the safe disposal of wastes;
11. Separate provisions of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) that
ensure proper siting, operation and disposal of wastes;
12. Siting standards for future dwelling units proposed that protect sunlight
easements/equipment turning radii onto adjoining farms and locate homes so as
to minimize land use conflict;
13. Language that specifically authorizes existing homes as permitted uses; and,
14. An Agricultural Nuisance Disclaimer that informs prospective residents of
potential impacts associated with normal farming practices that are protected
under the PA Right to Farm Law.